In a significant development, the Supreme Court reserved its order on the bail plea of former West Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee, who stands accused in a money laundering case linked to the infamous teacher recruitment scam. Chatterjee, who has been in custody since his arrest in July 2022, sought relief after the Calcutta High Court denied him bail earlier this year.
The case revolves around allegations of illegal recruitment of Assistant Teachers under the West Bengal Board of Primary Education. Chatterjee, who served as the Education Minister during the period in question, is accused of using his position to orchestrate the scam, with proceeds of crime allegedly laundered through co-accused Arpita Mukherjee.
The High Court’s Stand
The Calcutta High Court, while denying Chatterjee bail, cited substantial evidence of wrongdoing. It noted the extensive material seized during the investigation, including significant amounts of cash, jewelry, and properties linked to Chatterjee and Mukherjee. These seizures, coupled with witness statements and corroborating evidence under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), painted a damning picture of the accused.
The High Court specifically highlighted the financial entanglement between Chatterjee and Mukherjee. Several assets, including bank accounts, insurance policies, and immovable properties allegedly purchased through various shell companies, were reportedly held in Mukherjee’s name, indicating a relationship of mutual trust and confidence.
Given this, the court concluded that Chatterjee failed to meet the twin conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA, which require the accused to prove that they are not guilty and will not commit any offense if released on bail.
Supreme Court’s Observations
During the hearing in the Supreme Court, sharp observations were made about Chatterjee's role in the alleged scam. The bench remarked, "You are a corrupt person," underscoring the gravity of the charges against him. This pointed comment reflects the court's view of the evidence presented so far.
Chatterjee's counsel argued that he had been subjected to prolonged pre-trial detention and emphasized the constitutional right to a speedy trial. However, the prosecution countered these claims, asserting that his release could lead to tampering with witnesses and evidence.
Background of the Scam
The teacher recruitment scam has shaken West Bengal, raising questions about governance and accountability. Allegations suggest that recruitment processes were manipulated, allowing ineligible candidates to secure teaching positions in exchange for hefty bribes. Investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) uncovered a trail of illegal proceeds, with Chatterjee and Mukherjee at its center.
The ED’s raids resulted in the seizure of over ₹50 crore in cash, gold jewelry, and property documents from Mukherjee's residences. This massive haul has fueled public outrage and intensified scrutiny of Chatterjee's role in the scam.
Way Forward
While reserving its order, the Supreme Court acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations and the evidence presented. The outcome of Chatterjee’s bail plea will set a precedent for handling high-profile corruption cases under the PMLA. For now, Chatterjee remains in custody, with the shadow of the scam continuing to loom large over West Bengal's political landscape. This case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in public office, as well as the judiciary's critical role in ensuring justice.